Statistical Process Control
Complete online SPC toolkit for manufacturing quality control. Real-time process monitoring, control charts, and automated alerts. Minitab alternative—free during Beta.
• Statistical Process Control distinguishes common cause vs special cause variation
• SPC enables proactive defect prevention rather than reactive quality inspection
• SPC is foundational to Six Sigma Measure and Control phases
Complete Control Chart Library
Variable Charts
X-bar, R, I-MR, X-bar S, CUSUM, EWMA for continuous data
Attribute Charts
p-chart, np-chart, c-chart, u-chart for defect data
Capability
Cpk, Ppk, histograms, normality tests
Measurement
Gauge R&R, bias studies, linearity
Methodology Overview
Variable Charts monitor continuous measurement variation (dimensions, weights, temperatures) using statistical measures of central tendency and dispersion.
Attribute Charts monitor defect occurrence patterns when measurements are counts rather than continuous values (pass/fail, defect counts).
Capability Tools evaluate specification compliance only after stability is confirmed via control charts. Process capability requires stability first.
Measurement Tools validate data reliability before SPC deployment. MSA/Gauge R&R ensures measurement error doesn't mask true process variation.
Western Electric Rules (Auto-Detection)
Any single point outside control limits indicates immediate process change.
Nine consecutive points on same side of center line suggests process shift.
Six consecutive points steadily increasing or decreasing indicates drift.
Two out of three consecutive points beyond 2σ on same side warns of instability.
Four out of five consecutive points beyond 1σ on same side suggests increased variation.
Fifteen consecutive points within 1σ of center indicates stratification (subgroups present).
Eight consecutive points beyond 1σ of center suggests mixture of two distributions.
Fourteen consecutive points alternating up and down indicates over-adjustment.
SPC Assumptions
Valid SPC application requires specific statistical and operational conditions:
Process Stability Requirement
Process must be stable before capability analysis. Control charts establish stability; capability analysis follows. Calculating Cpk on unstable processes produces misleading results.
Validated Measurement System
Measurements must come from validated measurement systems. MSA must confirm gauge R&R < 30% (preferably < 10%) before SPC deployment. Measurement error can mask true process signals.
Representative Sampling
Sampling must represent true production conditions. Sampling only first-shift production or excluding setup periods creates biased charts that don't reflect actual process behavior.
Data Independence
Data points assumed independent unless autocorrelation evaluated. Sequential measurements that influence each other (e.g., temperature in heat-treated batches) require special chart types or time-series adjustments.
Control vs Specification Limits
Control limits represent natural process variation (3σ from mean), not specification limits. Capable processes may show control limit violations; in-control processes may produce out-of-specification output.
Model Limitations
Variation Detection Only
SPC identifies variation but does not diagnose root causes. Control chart signals indicate when to investigate, not why variation occurred. Root cause analysis tools are required for problem-solving.
Data Collection Dependency
SPC effectiveness depends on consistent data collection. Irregular sampling, missed measurements, or inconsistent operator techniques produce misleading charts and false signals.
Distribution Stability
SPC assumes statistical distribution stability. Processes with frequent distribution changes (batch-to-batch variation, seasonal effects) may require adaptive control limits or short-run SPC methods.
Non-Normal Data Constraints
Standard SPC charts assume approximately normal data. Highly skewed processes (time-to-failure, particle counts) may require transformation (Box-Cox) or non-parametric control charts for valid interpretation.
When NOT to Use SPC
SPC is inappropriate for certain quality management scenarios:
Prototype or Unstable Processes
Prototype or unstable early production processes lack the consistency required for meaningful control limits. Establish basic process stability before implementing SPC.
One-Time Project Quality Evaluation
One-time project or batch-only quality evaluation doesn't provide the time-series data SPC requires. Use inspection or capability studies instead for single-batch validation.
Extremely Low-Volume Production
Extremely low-volume production environments (job shops with runs of n < 10) lack sufficient data for reliable control limit calculation. Use pre-control or 100% inspection instead.
Causal Modeling Requirements
Situations requiring causal modeling or optimization need Design of Experiments (DOE) or regression analysis, not control charts. SPC monitors; DOE optimizes.
Industries Served
Manufacturing
Automotive, aerospace, electronics
Pharmaceutical
FDA compliance, batch records
Food & Beverage
HACCP, quality consistency
Healthcare
Patient safety, lab quality
Energy
Process efficiency, reliability
Technology
Semiconductor, assembly
Industry Applications
Decision Context
Web-based SPC improves collaboration and data accessibility across distributed teams. Shop floor operators, quality engineers, and management access the same real-time data without file version conflicts.
Real-time monitoring improves reaction speed to variation. Traditional batch analysis (end-of-shift reporting) allows hours of off-target production; real-time alerts enable immediate correction.
SaaS SPC reduces infrastructure deployment cost. No server installation, IT maintenance, or software updates required. Automatic feature updates without disruption.
Desktop tools remain useful for offline statistical experimentation and complex analysis not requiring real-time monitoring. Many organizations use both: desktop for deep analysis, web-based for operational monitoring.
Beginner's Guide to SPC
What SPC Monitors
SPC monitors process variation over time. Every process has natural variation (common cause), but sometimes special factors (tool wear, material changes) create unusual patterns. SPC distinguishes between these to prevent overreaction to normal variation and underreaction to real problems.
Why Variation Control Improves Quality
Consistent processes produce predictable output. When variation is controlled, you can tighten specifications, reduce inspection, and trust your process to meet customer requirements without 100% checking.
Real-World Example: Coffee Shop Brewing
Without SPC: Baristas guess when espresso extraction is "about right." Some shots are bitter (over-extracted), some sour (under-extracted). Customers complain, baristas adjust randomly, quality varies by shift.
With SPC: Track extraction time (25-30 seconds target) on a control chart. When times drift toward limits, investigate (grind setting, tamp pressure, bean freshness). Consistent shots, happy customers, less waste.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between SPC and quality inspection?
Inspection sorts good from bad after production (reactive). SPC monitors process variation to prevent defects (proactive). SPC asks "Is the process stable?" while inspection asks "Is this part good?" SPC prevents defects; inspection detects them.
What control chart should be used for different data types?
Continuous data (measurements): I-MR (individuals), X-bar R (subgroups), X-bar S (large subgroups). Attribute data (counts): p-chart (fraction defective), np-chart (number defective), c-chart (defect counts), u-chart (defects per unit).
Why can processes be stable but not capable?
Stability means consistent (predictable) output. Capability means output meets specifications. A process can be stable (always making 11mm parts) but incapable (specification is 10±0.5mm). Control charts show stability; capability indices (Cpk) show capability.
When should capability analysis follow SPC?
Always establish stability first. Capability analysis requires stable processes. Cpk calculated on unstable data is meaningless because the process isn't predictable. Use control charts first, then capability.
How often should SPC charts be updated?
Update frequency depends on production volume and criticality. High-volume production: real-time or hourly. Low-volume: per shift or daily. Update control limits (recalculate) only when process fundamentally changes, not routinely.
What sample size is needed for control limits?
Minimum 20-25 subgroups (typically 100+ individual data points) for reliable control limit calculation. Fewer points create wide, unstable limits that change significantly with each new point.
Deploy SPC in Minutes, Not Months
No IT, no installation, no credit card. Professional quality control—free.
Start Using SPC Software →