Production Planning
Determine optimal product mix given machine hours, labor, and material constraints to maximize profit.
Linear Programming Solver
Solve resource allocation optimization problems under linear constraints to maximize profit or minimize cost. Linear Programming supports decision science, operations research, and strategic planning by providing mathematically optimal solutions to complex business trade-offs. For beginners: LP helps you decide exactly how much of each product to make, given limited materials and labor, to earn the most profit—like solving a puzzle where you can't exceed your available resources but want the best possible outcome.
Solve LP Problem →What is Linear Programming?
Linear Programming (LP) is a mathematical method for determining a way to achieve the best outcome (such as maximum profit or lowest cost) in a given mathematical model whose requirements are represented by linear relationships. It's the foundation of operations research and management science.
LP models consist of three components: objective functions (what to maximize or minimize), constraints (resource limitations expressed as linear inequalities), and the feasible region (the geometric space containing all valid solutions). The feasible region is a convex polyhedron formed by constraint intersections. The optimal solution always lies at a corner point (vertex) of this region—a fundamental theorem that enables efficient simplex algorithm operation.
LP assumes linear relationships (proportionality and additivity) and deterministic inputs (known, constant parameters). These assumptions limit applicability to problems where changes produce proportional effects and uncertainty is minimal. However, LP serves as the foundation for advanced optimization models including Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), Nonlinear Programming (NLP), and stochastic programming extensions.
LP Optimization Fundamentals
What LP Accomplishes: Determines optimal resource allocation across competing activities. Calculates exact production quantities, resource distributions, or investment allocations that maximize return or minimize cost while respecting capacity limitations.
When to Apply: Use LP when facing resource constraints (limited materials, labor hours, or budget), multiple competing products or projects, and linear relationships between activity levels and outcomes.
Simple Example: A bakery has 100kg flour and 50 hours labor daily. Bread requires 1kg flour and 0.5 hours (profit $3). Cakes require 2kg flour and 1 hour (profit $5). Rather than guessing, LP calculates the optimal mix: 100 breads and 0 cakes, OR 0 breads and 50 cakes, or intermediate solutions based on which constraint binds. The solver identifies that flour is the limiting factor, recommending 100 breads for $300 profit—unless cake profit increases sufficiently to shift the optimal solution.
Standard LP Form
Understanding standard form helps interpret solver outputs and constraint binding status. Non-negativity constraints are required because negative production quantities or resource allocations lack physical meaning. The feasible region geometrically defines all possible solutions that satisfy every constraint simultaneously. In LP, the optimal solution typically occurs at corner points (intersections of constraints) rather than interior regions—this property enables the simplex algorithm to efficiently search finite vertices rather than infinite interior points.
Maximize (or Minimize): Z = c₁x₁ + c₂x₂ + ... + cₙxₙ
Subject to:
a₁₁x₁ + a₁₂x₂ + ... + a₁ₙxₙ ≤ b₁
a₂₁x₁ + a₂₂x₂ + ... + a₂ₙxₙ ≤ b₂
...
aₘ₁x₁ + aₘ₂x₂ + ... + aₘₙxₙ ≤ bₘ
a₂₁x₁ + a₂₂x₂ + ... + a₂ₙxₙ ≤ b₂
...
aₘ₁x₁ + aₘ₂x₂ + ... + aₘₙxₙ ≤ bₘ
And: x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ ≥ 0 (non-negativity constraints)
Features
Each solution method provides specific analytical capabilities with distinct computational characteristics. The simplex algorithm iteratively moves across feasible region boundaries from vertex to vertex, improving the objective function at each step until reaching optimality. Graphical method supports conceptual learning and verification for two-variable problems but cannot scale to higher dimensions. Sensitivity analysis evaluates decision robustness by calculating how much objective coefficients or constraint limits can change before the optimal solution shifts. Branch-and-bound extends LP to integer constraints but increases computational complexity exponentially—what solves in seconds for continuous variables may require hours for integer constraints. Dual problems provide economic interpretation of resource constraints, revealing shadow prices that represent marginal value of additional capacity.
Simplex Method
Implements the classic simplex algorithm for solving standard LP problems with unlimited variables and constraints.
Graphical Method (2D)
Visualize feasible regions and optimal solutions for two-variable problems. Perfect for learning and teaching.
Sensitivity Analysis
Shadow prices and allowable ranges for objective coefficients and RHS values. Understand how changes affect the solution.
Mixed Integer Programming
Solve problems requiring integer solutions (e.g., number of machines, whole units) using branch-and-bound.
Dual Problem
Automatically generate and solve the dual problem. Interpret shadow prices as marginal values.
Step-by-Step Solution
Educational mode shows each tableau iteration. Learn the simplex method by watching the algorithm work.
Business Applications
LP supports strategic decision-making across operational, tactical, and strategic planning horizons. The methodology enables cost optimization, profit maximization, and operational efficiency by mathematically evaluating trade-offs that exceed intuitive analysis capacity. While LP identifies mathematically optimal resource allocations, managerial feasibility review remains essential—solutions may require implementation adjustments for organizational constraints not captured in the model. Multi-objective trade-offs (balancing profit vs. environmental impact, or cost vs. service level) may require goal programming or weighted objective extensions beyond standard single-objective LP formulations.
Blending Problems
Optimize ingredient mixes (animal feed, gasoline, alloys) to meet specifications at minimum cost.
Transportation & Logistics
Minimize shipping costs from multiple plants to multiple warehouses subject to supply and demand constraints.
Portfolio Optimization
Allocate capital across investments to maximize return subject to risk constraints and diversification requirements.
Staff Scheduling
Minimize labor costs while meeting staffing requirements across shifts with varying demand patterns.
Cutting Stock Problems
Minimize waste when cutting raw materials (paper, metal, wood) into required sizes.
Inventory Management
Optimize multi-product ordering subject to warehouse space and budget constraints.
Resource Allocation
Distribute limited resources (budget, personnel, equipment) across competing projects for maximum value.
Linear Programming Assumptions
Valid LP solutions depend on specific mathematical and operational prerequisites. Violating these assumptions produces theoretically valid but practically meaningless results.
Linearity
Objective function and constraints must exhibit linear relationships—proportionality (doubling input doubles output) and additivity (combined effect equals sum of individual effects). Nonlinear returns or interactions violate this assumption.
Deterministic Coefficients
All parameters (profits, resource requirements, capacities) must be known constants. LP cannot directly incorporate uncertainty, probabilistic demand, or stochastic behavior without scenario analysis or stochastic programming extensions.
Divisibility
Decision variables can take fractional values (continuous). If solutions must be integers (number of machines, whole employees), standard LP provides approximate solutions requiring rounding or explicit integer programming formulation.
Parameter Accuracy
Resource availability and demand values must be accurately estimated. Small errors in constraint coefficients can shift the optimal solution significantly, particularly for binding constraints.
Model Limitations
Understanding LP constraints prevents overreliance and guides appropriate methodology selection:
Linearity Constraints
LP assumes linear relationships which may oversimplify real systems exhibiting economies of scale, diminishing returns, or threshold effects. Manufacturing setups often involve fixed costs and step functions that linear approximations misrepresent.
Parameter Sensitivity
Optimal solutions remain highly sensitive to inaccurate parameter estimation. Shadow prices and binding constraints shift dramatically with small changes in objective coefficients or right-hand-side values. Robust solutions require sensitivity analysis.
Uncertainty Handling
Standard LP does not incorporate uncertainty or probabilistic demand directly. Stochastic parameters require scenario analysis, chance-constrained programming, or recourse models that extend beyond basic LP formulations.
Dynamic Behavior
LP represents static snapshots. It cannot represent non-linear or dynamic system behavior, time-dependent variables, or sequential decision-making under learning without model extensions like multi-stage programming or simulation integration.
When NOT to Use Linear Programming
LP methodology provides inappropriate optimization guidance for specific problem structures where assumptions fundamentally conflict with reality:
Nonlinear Relationships
Problems involving nonlinear relationships, diminishing returns, or economies of scale require Nonlinear Programming (NLP) rather than LP. Examples include chemical process optimization with reaction kinetics or financial portfolios with risk-adjusted returns.
Stochastic Environments
Highly uncertain or stochastic demand environments where probability distributions dominate deterministic estimates require stochastic programming or robust optimization rather than single-scenario LP.
Complex System Simulation
Situations requiring simulation or heuristic optimization—such as discrete event systems with complex interactions, queueing networks, or agent-based models—exceed LP's algebraic representation capacity.
Dynamic Time-Based Decisions
Problems requiring dynamic time-based decision modeling with state transitions, learning effects, or path dependencies require dynamic programming, Markov decision processes, or optimal control theory rather than static LP.
Industry Application Expansion
LP optimization extends across sectors to address large-scale resource allocation challenges:
Airline Scheduling
Aircraft and crew routing optimization assigns planes to routes and crews to flights while respecting maintenance requirements, union regulations, and hub connectivity constraints. LP minimizes operating costs across thousands of daily flights.
Energy Production
Power generation optimization determines optimal mix of coal, natural gas, nuclear, and renewable sources to meet demand at minimum cost while respecting emission limits and transmission capacity constraints.
Supply Chain Network Design
Facility location and capacity planning determines optimal warehouse locations, sizes, and product flows to minimize total logistics costs while meeting service level requirements and capacity limitations.
Workforce Planning
Hiring, training, and scheduling optimization matches workforce composition to fluctuating demand across skill categories while minimizing labor costs and avoiding overtime or understaffing penalties.
Capital Budgeting
Investment allocation optimization selects project portfolios that maximize net present value subject to budget constraints, strategic balance requirements, and interproject dependency rules.
Solution Methods Available
Method selection significantly impacts computational efficiency and solution interpretability. Primal simplex excels when variables exceed constraints. Dual simplex provides computational advantage when constraints exceed variables or when modifying existing solutions with new constraints. Big-M and Two-Phase methods systematically find feasible starting solutions for problems lacking obvious initial feasible points—critical for equality-constrained formulations. Integer programming via branch-and-bound adds combinatorial complexity; each integer variable potentially doubles the solution space, making problems with hundreds of integer variables computationally intensive despite polynomial-time LP relaxations.
| Method | Best For | Variables | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphical | Teaching, 2-variable problems | 2 | Instant |
| Simplex (Primal) | Standard LP problems | Unlimited | Fast |
| Simplex (Dual) | More constraints than variables | Unlimited | Fast |
| Big-M Method | Problems with equality constraints | Unlimited | Moderate |
| Two-Phase | Finding initial feasible solution | Unlimited | Moderate |
| Branch & Bound | Integer programming (MILP) | 100+ | Depends on complexity |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between linear and nonlinear programming?
Linear Programming (LP) requires linear objective functions and constraints where variables appear with power of 1 and no multiplication between variables. Nonlinear Programming (NLP) allows exponents, logarithms, products of variables, and other nonlinear relationships. LP guarantees global optima and solves efficiently; NLP may find local optima and requires iterative algorithms with convergence challenges.
What is the feasible region in LP?
The feasible region is the geometric area (or volume in higher dimensions) containing all points that satisfy every constraint simultaneously. It is always a convex polyhedron bounded by constraint lines/planes. The optimal solution lies at one of the corner points (vertices) of this region, which is why the simplex algorithm searches vertices rather than interior points.
When should integer programming be used?
Use Integer Linear Programming (ILP) when decision variables must take whole number values—such as counting machines, employees, or discrete units. Standard LP provides continuous solutions (42.6 trucks), which may require unrealistic fractional implementation. ILP uses branch-and-bound to find integer-feasible solutions, though computational time increases significantly with problem size.
What do shadow prices represent?
Shadow prices (dual values) represent the marginal improvement in the objective function per unit increase in a constraint's right-hand side. A shadow price of $50 for a labor constraint means one additional labor hour increases profit by $50. Shadow prices are zero for non-binding constraints (slack available) and indicate economic value of capacity expansion for binding constraints.
Can LP models handle uncertainty?
Standard LP assumes deterministic (known, constant) parameters. To handle uncertainty, practitioners use scenario analysis (running multiple LP scenarios), sensitivity analysis (evaluating ranges), stochastic programming (explicit probability distributions), or robust optimization (worst-case guarantees). These extensions add complexity but provide more realistic solutions under uncertainty.
Solve Optimization Problems
Maximize profit, minimize cost, optimize resources. Free during Beta.
Launch LP Solver →